N148Z - 1998 SHORT BROS SD3-60 SHERPA - Complete Aircraft History & Registry Information

October 13, 2016 - Missoula, Montana

Damage Level

Minor

Description

The airline transport pilots reported that, during a ferry flight of an airplane that had just had been repainted, while on approach at its destination, the nose gear extended but failed to lock and subsequently collapsed on landing. Postaccident examination of the nose gear confirmed the nose gear's failure to lock, which led to its collapse. Observation of the nose gear down-lock actuator piston revealed that it had been painted, which prevented the piston from engaging and locking the nose gear during extension. Before the flight, maintenance personnel and the flight crew did not observe that the nose gear down-lock actuator piston area was painted. The airplane manufacturer issued a Service Information Letter (SIL) in 2007, that described a similar incident where the nose gear failed to lock in the down position on the first flight after an airplane had been repainted. The subsequent investigation revealed paint spray on the exposed piston of the nose landing gear down-lock actuator. The SIL stated "ensure that all masking material has been removed from the exposed piston after cleaning/painting, and that the piston is free from any paint or cleaning materials." Additionally, the landing gear emergency accumulator was observed during the preflight checks to be below the specified pressure. The accumulator was serviced to an adequate pressure prior to takeoff. Subsequently, the pressure bled down during the incident flight, and when the emergency landing gear extension was used by the flight crew, the accumulator did not have adequate pressure. According to the airplane manufacturer, the emergency landing gear extension is reliant on the main system pressure being depleted so that the emergency pressure can change a control valve position. Since the airplane's main hydraulic system was operative during the flight, the inability to use the landing gear emergency extension system, because of the lack of adequate pressure, would have been inconsequential, since the main system pressure was not depleted.